Erica Brown (Edison) Creation vs. Evolution the debate goes on, and on, and on…

Okay, so I’m browsing CNN.com, like I usually do every evening, and I happen to see a story in Ted Talk Tuesday’s titled, Darwin and the case for ‘militant atheism’. Of course I’m thinking, here we go again another wave in the sea of debate regarding Evolution and Creation. I decided to take a look at it anyway, (while I’m at it let me tell you that I do not believe in Evolution), the story details an interview with the biologist Richard Dawkins. Dawkins, who is an Atheist, has spent the last 30 plus years wrting a series of books supporting the claims Charles Darwin made in the “Orgin of Species”.

 Dawkins asserts in his book titled “The Selfish Gene, that “Living organisms had existed on earth, without ever knowing why, for over three thousand million years before the truth finally dawned on one of them. His name was Charles Darwin.”"Dawkins argues that there is no doubt that Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection is true and, unlike some other scholars of the subject, says belief in evolution is not compatible with faith in religion. In fact, he argues, science and religion undermine each other.”

“I believe a true understanding of Darwinism is deeply corrosive to religious faith,” Dawkins says in his TED Talk.

“Evolution teaches that as species evolve they eventually reach ideal population levels. As species advance, superior species eliminate inferior species — “survival of the fittest.” Weak and inferior members of a species should be eliminated for the preservation of superior bloodlines and for the conservation of essential resources. “Nature” doesn’t desire “the mating of weaker with stronger individuals, even less does she desire the blending of a higher with a lower race, since if she did, her whole work of higher breeding, over perhaps hundreds of thousands of years, might be ruined with one blow.” [1] “Thus, from the war of nature, from famine and death, the most exalted object which we are capable of conceiving, namely, the production of the higher animals, directly follows.” [2] And as humans are merely a species of animal, we have no intrinsic value and are therefore by no means exempt from “the war of nature.” Thus, we have Adolf Hitler (1889-1945) asking the rhetorical question, “should I not also have the right to eliminate millions of an inferior race that multiplies like vermin?”  http://www.allaboutphilosophy.org/creation-vs-evolution.htm

So evolution is based on the premise of “Survival of the Fittest” no wonder Adolf Hitler used it to justify his actions against the Jews. It’s no secret that Darwin is views as a racist and held contempt for weaker, uncivilized people. Follow this link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4mxXICZ9mXo to watch a clip about this claim.

I’m no expert on the subject by any stretch of the imagination, but I just don’t understand why the theory of natural selection makes sense. Was the early form of existence on the earth so repulsive that organisms had to continually replecate themselves? And what would have happened had the ”Big Bang” gone wrong? What if the fundumental elements needed  to produce life after the big bang had been the slightest bit off, then would nothing have existed. Obviously not, but how can evolutionsits explain the fact that everything went just “perfect” during and after the ”Big Bang” was it pure luck or an Intelligent Design? Even if they tried to show using the Laws of Nature that everything was ripe for evolution, who developed these laws and how did they come to exist?

Both creationsists and evolutionists believe the earth started at some finite point, with Creationsists believeing with God and evolutionists believing there was some sort of  cataclysmic explosion. Either way you look at it the earth started from somewhere, it just didn’t exist.

Back to the CNN.com post, Dawkins asserts that aethists should defend themselves against religionat all costs. Now it seems to me that Aetheism is a religion in it’s own right. It is the choice or “belief” that you are going to refuse to beleive in God and choose to believe in secularism and science.

As far as I know evolution is tought in school, but I never saw creationism in one of my textbooks. Why can’t we look at both sides of the issue. Keep in mind that evolution is just a theory and has not been proven, so why are schools so hesitant to let children see both sides of the coin?

Well anyway, I’m going to wrap this up, there’s tons more I could write and various points of view to present, but in the end people have a choice to believe what they want.

This entry was posted on 26. November 2009 at 01:47 and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site.