| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Oct | Dec » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | |||||
- Introduction to Sociology (959)
- Mr. Andoscia (161)
- Social Problems (884)
- Uncategorized (1180)
- 10. February 2012: EmmOvin-Abstinence, vows, & education
- 7. February 2012: EmmOvin-Changes in the American family
- 6. February 2012: Overbearing Parents
- 2. February 2012: EmmOvin-Cohabiting
- 14. January 2012: Victim's Families in Mississippi Are Upset - ConnieB
- 9. December 2011: Blogs are now Closed for the Semester
- 9. December 2011: School choice Mara Runion
- 9. December 2011: Cheatonyourspouse.com-SRC
- 9. December 2011: Gay Marriage-Joel Martin
- 9. December 2011: Gay marriges Mara Runion
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
Affirmative Action or Preferential Treatment by Ashley Thomas (FGCU)
A Caucasian senior in high school applies for college. He has a 3.8 GPA and excellent scores on his SAT and ACT tests. His essay is well written and meets all the requirements of the college. Another senior, a student of Native American descent, applies for the same college. She has a 3.6 GPA and also scored well on his tests. Though her essay was a little sub-par, she gets accepted over the Caucasian student. Why do you think this is? We have affirmative action to thank for situations like these. Though created with good intent, programs like this have actually widened the gap between race and gender. Instead of making sure all races and gender have the same opportunity, affirmative action has actually furthered the notion of “me vs. them”.
Though affirmative action has done some good, I feel it hasn’t done enough to be considered effective. Nearly 97 percent of corporate senior executives in the United States are white. Only 5 percent of all professionals are black, and Hispanics hold only 4 percent of white-collar jobs even though they make up 7.5 percent of the work force.
Equal opportunity programs are turning into preferential treatment programs. Programs like these often ignore the claim of need and lean towards the minorities. For example, disadvantaged white males have been denied benefits while minorities who aren’t in need of them have been lavished with perks. The burden of compensation is being placed on white males who are seeking jobs or further education. Why should this burden be on them when they are no more responsible for past injustices or mistreatment than any other group? It seems unfair that they should be found responsible for carrying the burden themselves.
I feel affirmative action and similar programs actually harm minorities and women by devaluing their achievements and abilities. These programs further the notion to minorities and women that they are being accepted because their numbers are under represented and not because their achievements adequately qualify them. This undoubtedly leads to feelings of incompetence, self-doubt, and ironically, inferiority.
Twenty-five years ago, 80 percent of the student population at University of California, Berkeley was white. Today, that number is 25 percent. It is no doubt that affirmative action and similar programs are the source of this statistic. While equal-opportunity programs have fairness and equality in mind, they have quite the opposite effect. I feel that instead of stressing fairness and focusing on being so politically correct all the time, we should be driving home the importance of hard work and a competitive yet friendly spirit. The treatment you get should be based on what you do, and not what you are.