<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tort Reform by Catherine Rost</title>
	<link>http://livingtextblog.andosciasociology.net/2009/11/09/tort-reform-by-catherine-rost/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 06:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Andoscia</title>
		<link>http://livingtextblog.andosciasociology.net/2009/11/09/tort-reform-by-catherine-rost/#comment-19791</link>
		<author>Mr. Andoscia</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://livingtextblog.andosciasociology.net/2009/11/09/tort-reform-by-catherine-rost/#comment-19791</guid>
		<description>What constitutes a "frivolous" lawsuit is subjective.  Most doctors would suggest that all lawsuits are frivolous.  Indeed, this is a red herring as far as costs to health care.  Only about .5% of the cost of health care can be attributed to torts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What constitutes a &#8220;frivolous&#8221; lawsuit is subjective.  Most doctors would suggest that all lawsuits are frivolous.  Indeed, this is a red herring as far as costs to health care.  Only about .5% of the cost of health care can be attributed to torts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

