Death penalty by Frank Estrada

There are a lot of people who think that the death penalty shouldn’t be legal anywhere in the United States. They say that killing someone doesn’t right the wrong that has been committed against society and/or another individual. They say that executing the offender doesn’t allow him a chance to get rehabilitated and become a productive member of society. All of this may be true, but it also prevents the criminal from killing or raping someone again, ever. Although the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution was ratified in an era when the death penalty was still widely practiced, it is difficult to argue that poisoning or electrocuting someone to death doesn’t constitute “cruel and unusual punishment.”At the dawn of the 21st century, the death penalty is considered by most civilized nations as a cruel and inhuman punishment. 30 countries have abolished it since 1990. However, the death penalty continues to be commonly applied in other nations. China, the Democratic Republic of Congo, the United States and Iran are the most prolific executioners in the world. Indeed, the US is one of six countries (including also Iran, Nigeria, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Yemen), which executes people who were under 18 years old at the time they committed their crimes. While worldwide documents have restricted and in some cases even banned the death penalty, its request is still not against expected international law. Much debate continues in the US as to whether it constitutes an appropriate punishment, at least to the most dreadful crimes. In recent years, the debate has been further fueled by the use of new technologies, which have shown that a large percentage of people sentenced to death are, indeed, innocent. Ninety-five percent of the crime in the United States is committed by five percent of the population. This means that when criminals are rehabilitated and are set free or paroled, that many, if not most, of them will again break the law. If the violent offenders against society such as the first-degree murderers and rapists were executed, then violent crime rates would drop straight into the basement.

2 Responses to “Death penalty by Frank Estrada”

  1. Dudley Sharp says:

    Possibly, 0.3% of those sentneced to death were actaul innocent. They we all released. This seems like a very small percentage of the total. The claims that the percentage is much higher, 1.7%, is false, as fact checking will show.

    Innocents are more at risk without the death penalty.

    The 5th, 8th and 14th Amendements demonstrate the constitutionality of the death penalty, as do all of the death penalty decisons by the US Supreme Court, since the country was formed.

  2. Mr. Andoscia says:

    China, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and Iran? These are the nations that we can compare the United States to. OK. In fact, murder and violent rape is not only common in the Congo, but systematized. The Death Penalty does not help in these cases. As for the number of people who have been executed who turned out to be innocent, Mr. Sharps stats, and anybody’s stats for that matter, are difficult to parse. As there’s very little investigation into the innocence of a death penalty victim after they are already executed. Life without the possibility of parole also keeps innocent people safe and allows some recompense if the state and the jury makes a mistake.

Leave a Reply