| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Apr | Jun » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
| 31 | ||||||
- Introduction to Sociology (802)
- Mr. Andoscia (75)
- Social Problems (555)
- Uncategorized (902)
- 10. September 2010: Christina Thomas (Edison) Meth signs in GA
- 9. September 2010: Maria Rodriguez (Edison), Abortion
- 8. September 2010: Katherine Blackford (FGCU): Florida minister plans to burn a Quran on Sept. 11th.
- 4. September 2010: ColleenConway, Edison: FaceBook - My new BestFriend?
- 3. September 2010: Jenny Liles: Edison: Econonmy inspiring innovation?
- 2. September 2010: M. Vote for Miggie:Migdalia Castro(Edison)
- 1. September 2010: Thomas Grimes Edison State "Why the Body Art Dude?"
- 31. August 2010: Katherine Blackford, FGCU: More Public Schools Requiring Uniforms
- 30. August 2010: Zachary Martell (FGCU): Should immigration from Cuba to Florida be illegal?
- 29. August 2010: Thomas Grimes Edison State College "Whose God Mr Beck?"
Jenny Damon (Edison): FCAT Scores
The Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) results are due to come out to students this week across the state. Many families wait nervously as their children’s promotion to the next grade depends on their test results. Children as young as eight and nine years old feel tremendous amounts of test anxiety, stress, and burn-out as teachers push their own achievement pressures on to their students. The FCAT was designed in 1971 to assess academic strengths and weaknesses, particularly in the basic skills. Its manifest function was to implement a workable system of accountability for the public schools. The students’ results from the FCAT are used to grade individual schools. There is a direct relationship between financial funding and the school’s grade. Although since its inception scores have risen, the latent effects of stress, pressure, and stigma to the schools is becoming more evident. Early objections to the FCAT have ranged from challenges to administrative procedures (Bradey v. State of Florida, 1979) to objections of stigmatizing entire schools (Debra P. v. Turlington, 1982). More recent criticism centers on the over-emphasis of FCAT scores, teaching to the test, and funding being directed away from the very schools that need it most. Although test scores can be diagnostically useful, they should not be used to drive the curriculum.