| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Apr | Jun » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
| 31 | ||||||
- Introduction to Sociology (958)
- Mr. Andoscia (160)
- Social Problems (881)
- Uncategorized (1179)
- 2. February 2012: EmmOvin-Cohabiting
- 14. January 2012: Victim's Families in Mississippi Are Upset - ConnieB
- 9. December 2011: Blogs are now Closed for the Semester
- 9. December 2011: School choice Mara Runion
- 9. December 2011: Cheatonyourspouse.com-SRC
- 9. December 2011: Gay Marriage-Joel Martin
- 9. December 2011: Gay marriges Mara Runion
- 9. December 2011: Childhood Obesity- Amanda Robinson
- 9. December 2011: Ruben Edison Hacktavist
- 9. December 2011: Gangs (THAT KID)
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
Jenny Damon (Edison): FCAT Scores
The Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) results are due to come out to students this week across the state. Many families wait nervously as their children’s promotion to the next grade depends on their test results. Children as young as eight and nine years old feel tremendous amounts of test anxiety, stress, and burn-out as teachers push their own achievement pressures on to their students. The FCAT was designed in 1971 to assess academic strengths and weaknesses, particularly in the basic skills. Its manifest function was to implement a workable system of accountability for the public schools. The students’ results from the FCAT are used to grade individual schools. There is a direct relationship between financial funding and the school’s grade. Although since its inception scores have risen, the latent effects of stress, pressure, and stigma to the schools is becoming more evident. Early objections to the FCAT have ranged from challenges to administrative procedures (Bradey v. State of Florida, 1979) to objections of stigmatizing entire schools (Debra P. v. Turlington, 1982). More recent criticism centers on the over-emphasis of FCAT scores, teaching to the test, and funding being directed away from the very schools that need it most. Although test scores can be diagnostically useful, they should not be used to drive the curriculum.