| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Mar | May » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | ||
- Introduction to Sociology (959)
- Mr. Andoscia (161)
- Social Problems (884)
- Uncategorized (1180)
- 10. February 2012: EmmOvin-Abstinence, vows, & education
- 7. February 2012: EmmOvin-Changes in the American family
- 6. February 2012: Overbearing Parents
- 2. February 2012: EmmOvin-Cohabiting
- 14. January 2012: Victim's Families in Mississippi Are Upset - ConnieB
- 9. December 2011: Blogs are now Closed for the Semester
- 9. December 2011: School choice Mara Runion
- 9. December 2011: Cheatonyourspouse.com-SRC
- 9. December 2011: Gay Marriage-Joel Martin
- 9. December 2011: Gay marriges Mara Runion
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
Dwight Fetterman (FGCU) The Formerly Secret “Secret Memos”
The Obama Administration should not have declassified and released the memos as it gives the enemy a broader understanding of our intel operations. The reasons that the administration did this seem obvious.
There are two theories out there about this. Let’s start with the Guardian UK:
…Senior members of the Bush administration today defended the physical abuse of prisoners by CIA operatives at Guantánamo and elsewhere round the world set out in graphic detail in secret memos released by president Barack Obama.
General Michael Hayden, head of the CIA under president George Bush, and Michael Mukasey, who was attorney-general, criticised Obama for releasing the memos. The two accused him of pandering to the media in creating “faux outrage”, undermining the morale of the intelligence services and inviting the scorn of America’s enemies.
But the interrogation techniques outlined in the memos prompted a flood of calls from human rights groups and others for the prosecution of politicians, lawyers, doctors and CIA operatives involved…
Faux Outrage. That IS the basic emote out of the WH these days. Why is it fake outrage? Because if it were real outrage, the WH would have changed something, ANYTHING, about how we conduct the war, intel operations, interrogations, a.n.y.t.h.i.n.g. And the left is going berserk over the President’s pledge to not seek charges against the CIA agents involved.
BTW, all of the methods of “torture” are derived from SERE training and some of the authors here have experienced just about all of them. The Guardian article above has a decent rundown of the different “tortures” like Nudity, Sleep and Food Deprivation, etc.
One prominent attorney from the Council on Foreign Relations sees it very differently:
…David Rivkin, a constitutional lawyer and member of the Council on Foreign Relations, released a statement Friday saying the release of four memos provides a “great benefit” to the former president.
“This data is analyzed in great detail to establish that the use of these techniques does not inflict either physical or psychological damage,” said Rivkin, who served in the administrations of Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush. “The conclusions (the) memos reach — that the specific interrogation techniques used by the CIA did not constitute torture — are eminently reasonable.”…
In other words, the released memos prove that the Bush administration did not use torture.
Thank you, President Obama, for putting this silly argument to bed.
I’m certain that was your intent.
20. April 2009 at 20:51
In fact, the opposite is the case. All of these methods are legally designed as torture by international treaty. Treaties that the United States has signed on to and are, therefore, legally binding by virtue of our own Constitution.
That the administration is doing nothing to reverse the very policies that they are bringing into the open has more to say about power than it does the validity of the claim.
That one man, a legal scholar, claims that these methods are not harmful either psychologically or physically is pretty thin considering the vast array of research from “psychologists” and “physiologists” to the contrary.
Also, what about the social harm done by using these techniques. The key criticism from the military, including top Pentagon officials, is that such methods encourage our enemies to use the same techniques (or worse) on American captives. How does this impact the legitimacy of a standing army in an otherwise sovereign nation like Iraq, and how does this translate to the legitimacy of a shoestring government propped up by that army?
I’m afraid I cannot concur with your opinion on many grounds here.